The administration of the abbey’s estates
could be complex, expensive and time-consuming. Like other religious
communities,
Byland had its fair share of problems maintaining its holdings
and defending its interests. A particularly bitter disagreement
emerged between Byland and its Cistercian neighbours at Fountains in
the late twelfth century, regarding their mutual interests in Nidderdale.
Both communities had acquired considerable holdings
here, courtesy of Roger
de Mowbray, and held Upper Nidderdale between
them.(22) The dispute reached a climax
in the 1220s over their respective rights to mine the Tankersley
Ore. The General Chapter intervened,
denounced their bickering as a disgrace to the Cistercian Order
and appointed the abbots of Rievaulx, Furness and Beaulieu to
resolve the dispute.(23)
Run-ins with Rievaulx
The Byland community also clashed with the monks of Rievaulx, and engaged
in a series of disputes over rival interests at Shitlington (Rievaulx)
and Emley (Byland), at Hesketh grange (Rievaulx) and Old Byland (Byland),
and also at Deepdale (Byland) and Griff (Rievaulx).
[Burton, The Monastic Order in Yorkshire, p. 262 ]
Byland faced problems also from the heirs of its benefactors, who
contested the abbey’s rights to land and resources granted
by their predecessors. In the late twelfth century, Byland had
to rise to the defence of its lands in Westmorland when Robert,
son of Peter, challenged the community’s rights to common
pasture between Bleatern and Warcop. Torphin of Warcop, the chief
lord of the vill, was amongst those called upon to resolve the
dispute. It was decided that Robert should retain eighty-two acres
of land here, and the precise nature of rights of entry, exit and
access to pasture was carefully delineated.(24) In
the thirteenth century Byland’s patronal family, the Mowbrays,
contested the abbey’s
rights in Nidderdale. Roger de Mowbray’s grandson, William,
sought to evict the monks from its lands here in 1204 but following
the arbitration of the dean and treasurer of York, and upon the
receipt of money, he withdrew his challenge. Later in the century,
William’s grandson was similarly appeased with a cash payment
and the gift of a horse.(25)