|
You are here:
Library (continued)
(3/3)
What kind of books were
in the library?
Only 21 manuscripts from
Rievaulx survive. Walter Daniel’s Centum Sententiae is
now in the John Rylands Library, Manchester (Rylands Latin MS 196). Others
are in
the British Library and Jesus College, Cambridge. More..
|
The two hundred or so manuscripts
that are listed in the library catalogue of Rievaulx cover a wide
range of subjects, including
history, grammar, logic, philosophy and medicine. These topics
accounted for a small percentage of the total collection, and the
vast majority of works were theological – in fact, about
85% of the library’s holdings; the library catalogue of Meaux
Abbey suggests c. 81% of its books were concerned with theology.(3) The
theological works in Rievaulx’s library included Bibles
and psalters, authoritative writings by St Augustine and Bede;
there were also works by renowned Cistercians, primarily Bernard
of Clairvaux and Aelred
of Rievaulx, but also by home-grown writers
such as Matthew and Maurice of
Rievaulx. The collection at Rievaulx seems fairly representative
of a Cistercian monastic library at
this time and is similar to the library at Meaux.(4) Comparison
with Benedictine and Augustinian libraries, however, suggests that
the
Cistercian collection was less wide-ranging, more theology-based,
and had fewer works on philosophy and science.(5) The later Middle Ages
A sixteenth-century will of a former monk of Rievaulx, Richard
Hall, mentions a number of books which may have belonged to the
abbey before the dispersal of the community at the Dissolution.
Richard, who served as curate of Lathom, left the vicar of Pocklington
several books including the Speculum Morale Vincentii,
a medieval dictionary (Ortus vocabularum), and Erasmus’ New
Testament in Latin. A Robert Riche was to receive his New Testament
in English,
and John Brigham, a priest, was to have seven of his best books
with the remainder shared between Christopher Hustler, parson of
Elvington, and John Thompson, who was a priest of Wheldrake.(6)
Were these manuscripts produced at Rievaulx ? Read more
|
|
|
<back> <next
section> |