In the same battle in which Guido, king of Jerusalem,
was made prisoner,
Roger de Mowbray was taken; whom in the following year the brethren
of
the Hospital of the Temple ransomed from the hands of pagans, shortly
after
which he died.(1)
According to contemporary accounts, Roger
de Mowbray died in Palestine shortly after his capture there in 1187, and
was buried at Sures. By the
late thirteenth century, however, the monks of Byland clearly thought
that his grave was in their chapter-house. Moreover, a sixteenth-century
narrative
from Roger’s Augustinian foundation at Newburgh describes how he had
actually returned to live in England for some fifteen years and
was then buried in the chapter-house at Byland Abbey. Indeed, following
their visitation of the religious houses in the North of England,
in 1535, the royal commissioners, Doctors Layton
and Legh, remarked that the sepulchre of Roger and his wife lay
in Byland’s
chapter-house.
A North Yorkshire safari
The colourful account of Roger’s supposed return journey from the
Holy Land, described in a sixteenth-century narrative from Newburgh Priory,
tells of adventure, fantasy and daring. According to this version of events,
Roger wrestled with a dragon and encountered a lion, which he brought back
with him to his castle at Hood, in Yorkshire. His exploits are remarkably
similar to those of the Arthurian hero, Yvain, in Chrétien de Troyes’ twelfth-century
romance, ‘The
knight and the lion’.
A search for Roger’s grave in the nineteenth century
resulted in the recovery of a tomb slab that was thought to be
his but was more than likely
from the grave of a former abbot of Byland, since it bore a mitre,
rather than a sword. A slab incised with a sword found in the cloister
in the 1920s
is also unlikely to have belonged to Roger and was probably one
of the graves flung out from the church during the spoliation of
the abbey in the sixteenth
century.
The evidence for Roger’s burial in the chapter-house
at Byland remains shrouded in mystery, but Gilyard-Beer has recently
suggested a possible – and
convincing – explanation to this enigma. According to his hypothesis,
the fourteenth-century monks of Byland may have considered it important
to have a founder’s grave within the abbey precinct and thus sought
to construct some sort of memorial to Roger. By the sixteenth century,
however, what had been intended as a commemoration of Roger was
thought to mark the
spot where he was buried; hence the conflicting evidence and the
likelihood that his grave will never be recovered by excavation
of the site.(2)